WEAVER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Shotz v. City OF Plantation, 344 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …ry, and we certainly should not do so to undermine the plain meaning of the statutory language.’ ” United States v. Weaver, 275 F. 3d 1320, 1331 (11th Cir.2001), (quoting Harris v. Garner, 216 F. 3d 970, 976 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc)), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 961, 122 S.Ct. 2666, 153 L.Ed.2d 840 (2002). If “the statutory language is not entirely transparent,” we employ traditional canons of construction before “reverting to legislative history ... [to] assist [us] in determining the meaning of a particular…
• United States v. Freixas, 332 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …uld be prejudiced if the defendant were allowed to withdraw his plea.” 283 F. 3d at 1309 (quoting United States v. Buckles, 843 F. 2d 469, 472 (11th Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Weaver, 275 F. 3d 1320, 1327-28 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 961, 122 S.Ct. 2666, 153 L.Ed.2d 840 (2002). Moreover, “[w]hen a district court accepts a guilty plea, it must ensure that the three core concerns of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure have been met: ‘(1) the guilty plea must be free fr…
• Fed. Election Comm'n v. Reform Party OF THE United States, 479 F.3d 1302 (11th Cir. 2007)
  …tory, and we certainly should not do so to undermine the plain meaning of the statutory language.’ ” United States v. Weaver, 275 F. 3d 1320, 1331 (11th Cir.2001) (quoting Harris v. Garner, 216 F. 3d 970, 976 (11th Cir.2000)(en banc)), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 961, 122 S.Ct. 2666, 153 L.Ed.2d 840 (2002). Shotz v. City of Plantation, 344 F. 3d 1161, 1167 (11th Cir.2003). These principles of statutory construction support the district court’s conclusion that the exclusive forum for consideration of the issues…