OAKLEY
v.
WISCONSIN

U.S. | 2002-10-07
No. 01-1573
537 U.S. 813 Supreme Court of the United States (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shotz v. City OF Plantation, 344 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …upra pp. 1368-1169 & note 8. . Although the Second Circuit held on its own that the retaliation provision provides for individual liability, Reg’l Econ. Cmty, Action Program, Inc. v. City of Middletown, 294 F. 3d 35, 45 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 813, 123 S.Ct. 74, 154 L.Ed.2d 16 (2002), we follow the customary route of relying on authoritative agency regulations. As such, we need not decide how we would have come out absent the regulation. . The relevant DOJ regulation provides that "[n]o priva…
  • United States v. Polar, 369 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2004)
    …cause to excuse a juror.” Fed. R.Crim.P. 23(b)(3). “Just cause exists to dismiss a juror when that juror refuses to apply the law or to follow the court’s instructions.” United States v. Abbell, 271 F. 3d 1286, 1302 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 813, 123 S.Ct. 74, 154 L.Ed.2d 16 (2002). The jurors here sent the district court three separate notes complaining of an uncooperative juror. The third and final note requested that the judge dismiss the juror, who was refusing to vote and had indicate…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw