ADELE W. SNEAD AND ROBERT SNEAD, PETITIONERS,

v.

CHARLES H. PLAVCHAK, JOHN PLAVCHAK AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Linehan v. State, 476 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1985)
  …83) (attempted second-degree murder); Askew v. State, 118 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1960) (rape); Folks v. State, 85 Fla. 288, 95 So. 619 (1923) (manslaughter); Link v. State, 429 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (possession of methaqualudes); Williams v. State, 250 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) (violence while resisting arrest); Crusoe v. State, 239 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970) (passing forged bank checks). As noted above, voluntary intoxication has been recognized in this state for more than ninety years as a valid de…
• Frey v. State, 708 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 1998)
  …person of such officer ... is guilty of a felony of the third degree.” . See Linehan, 476 So. 2d at 1264 (“Florida courts have rejected the voluntary intoxication defense in the following cases involving general intent crimes.... Williams v. State, 250 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) (violence while resisting arrest)...Cf. Colson v. State, 73 So. 2d 862 (Fla.1954) (the jury did not err in rejecting the claim that the defendant was too drunk to "resist ... the sheriff”). We disapprove Gonzales v. State, 488 So.…
• Frey v. State, 679 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
  …d from that opinion. However, in Linehan, the court noted that Florida courts have rejected the voluntary intoxication defense “in the following eases” involving general intent crimes. One of the eases listed in this category was Williams v. State, 250 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), which the court described as a case involving violence while resisting arrest. Williams actually is equivocal on the issue. The court said in that case: Appellant’s argument that because he was intoxicated he ought not be held t…

Authorities Cited

• Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Clonts, 248 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)