RAYMOND E. VIEHBECK, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SANDRA VIEHBECK, DECEASED, AND RAYMOND E. VIEHBECK, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
LOUIS HAUSHEER ET AL., DEFENDANTS
RAYMOND E. VIEHBECK, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SANDRA VIEHBECK, DECEASED, AND RAYMOND E. VIEHBECK, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS,
LOUIS HAUSHEER ET AL., DEFENDANTS
250 So. 2d 311
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 42 cases
Opinion of the Court
The answer to the questions propounded under F.A.R. 4.6, 32 F.S.A., is denied because the questions do not come within the limits enunciated by the Supreme Court in Schwob Company v. Florida Industrial Commission, 152 Fla. 203, 11 So.2d 782. See also Spaulding v. Fla. Gas Co., Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 695 [opinion filed First District June 24, 1971].
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Elliott Buchman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 381 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 1980)…McDonald, justice. This Court has granted certiorari under article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. There is apparent conflict on the issue of admissibility of expert testimony as defined in Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Hill, 250 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), writ discharged 270 So. 2d 359 (Fla.1972), and Public Health Foundation v. Cole, 352 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. denied 361 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1978). [*230] The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the Second D…1 / 2
-
Johnson v. State, 314 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)…lated to some science, profession, business or occupation as to be beyond the understanding of the average layman. (Mills v. Redwing Carriers, Inc., Fla.App. 2nd, 1961, 127 So. 2d 453; Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Hill, Fla.App. 4th 1971, 250 So. 2d 311) It is axiomatic that an opinion from an expert witness should not be admitted unless a sufficient predicate has been laid therefor. (See Myers v. Korbly, Fla.App. 2nd 1958, 103 So. 2d 215) Sub judice there is no question about the qualifications…
-
The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. v. Surette, 394 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…harmless error where there is other sufficient evidence to justify the jury in reaching the conclusion supported by the opinion of the expert. Hughes v. Canal Insurance Company, 308 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975); Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. Hill, 250 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); Brevard County v. Apel, 246 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) and Delta Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Rihl, 218 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). IV. The appellants’ final point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying their motion…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Schwob Co. of Fla. v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 152 Fla. 203 (Fla. 1942)
- Bowman v. Emp'rs Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. of Wis., 249 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)