RAYMOND RIDLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RAYMOND RIDLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
250 So. 2d 341
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Davis v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 701; Hernandez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 69; Hammer v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 619. See also Belsky v. State, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 256.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Tampa v. Addison, 979 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…w supports the constitutionality of the imposition of occupational license taxes on members of The Florida Bar. See Sand- [*253] strom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 133 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961) (Sandstrom I); Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 250 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (Sandstrom II). In response, the Appellees argue that the facts of Sandstrom I and Sandstrom II are distinguishable from the facts of this case. The Appellees suggest that the authority of these cases is nothing more than an “ill…
Authorities Cited
- Hernandez v. State, 212 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Belsky v. State, 231 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
- Davis v. State, 209 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Hammer v. State, 213 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)