CATILINA CAMPILLO DE CLINE, BLANCA CAMPILLO DE CLINE, MAMYE ELIZABETH CAMPILLO DE CLINE, KATIE CLINE BARFIELD AND HUSBAND, O. C. BARFIELD, JULIA CLINE MCCRARY, WIDOW, CLARE CLINE LITES AND HUSBAND A. P. LITES, MAGGIE CLINE STRAINING, WIDOW, R. L. CLINE, AND JOHN C. CLINE, APPELLANTS,
v.
INEZ CLINE, A WIDOW, FREDERICK CLINE AND ROBERT L. CLINE, BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND, INEZ CLINE, APPELLEES
CATILINA CAMPILLO DE CLINE, BLANCA CAMPILLO DE CLINE, MAMYE ELIZABETH CAMPILLO DE CLINE, KATIE CLINE BARFIELD AND HUSBAND, O. C. BARFIELD, JULIA CLINE MCCRARY, WIDOW, CLARE CLINE LITES AND HUSBAND A. P. LITES, MAGGIE CLINE STRAINING, WIDOW, R. L. CLINE, AND JOHN C. CLINE, APPELLANTS,
INEZ CLINE, A WIDOW, FREDERICK CLINE AND ROBERT L. CLINE, BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND, INEZ CLINE, APPELLEES
101 Fla. 488
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Caution
Also reported at: 134 So. 546 · 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1745
Cited by 35 cases
Opinion of the Court
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the order of the court below should be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant the prayer of ■ the petition and direct that the petitioners be made parties to the suit.
Buford, C.J., and Whítfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Lilly K. Heisler v. Fla. Mortg. Title & Bonding Co. & N. A. Perry, 105 Fla. 657 (Fla. 1932)…tigation are to be controlled by the decree is a necessary party to the suit, and a court of chan [*669] cery will not proceed without them. Bannon vs. Trammell, 96 Fla. 408, 118 So. 167; McAdoo vs. Moses, 132 So. 638; Cline vs. Cline, 101 Fla. 488, 134 So. 546. The record does not reveal that the complainants in the injunction suits acquired by the deed to them any rights that will be affected by a decree in Mrs. Heisler’s favo'r, in this litigation. While the deeds to them provided that their said prope…
-
Thomas v. Doyle E. Carlton, 106 Fla. 648 (Fla. 1932)…ther as complainants or defendants if he is willing to stand upon his bill as framed by him and take the consequences of other persons not being made parties.” See also, Brecht vs. Bur-ne Co., 91 Fla. 345, 108 So. 173; Cline vs. Cline, 101 Fla. 488, 134 So. 546. For the reasons stated, the order appealed from is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Costs of this appeal shall be taxed against the appellants. [*670] Bufo…
-
Coast Cities Coaches, Inc. v. Whyte, 130 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)…Contracts § 328. . See Indian River Mfg. Co. v. Wooten, 48 Fla. 271, 37 So. 731; Troublefield v. Troublefield, 60 Fla. 387, 53 So. 518; Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. Co. v. City of Rockledge, 97 Fla. 644, 121 So. 807; Cline v. Cline, 101 Fla. 488, 134 So. 546; Cracowaner v. Worthington, 101 Fla. 756, 135 So. 304; Coral Realty Co. v. Peacock Holding Co., 103 Fla. 916, 138 So. 622; Heisler v. Florida Mortgage Title & Bonding Co., 105 Fla. 657, 142 So. 242; W. F. S. Co. v. Anniston Nat. Bank of Anniston, Al…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence