ESPINOZA
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2002-10-07
No. 02-5459
537 U.S. 917 Supreme Court of the United States (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Waterfield v. State, 1 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
    …994); Waterfield v. State, 541 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). See also Waterfield v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 1196, 126 S.Ct. 2871, 165 L.Ed.2d 903 (2006); Waterfield v. Florida, 543 U.S. 888, 125 S.Ct. 164, 160 L.Ed.2d 148 (2004); Waterfield v. Moore, 537 U.S. 917, 123 S.Ct. 302, 154 L.Ed.2d 203 (2002); Waterfield v. Swigert, 519 U.S. 837, 117 S.Ct. Ill, 136 L.Ed.2d 64 (1996); Waterfield v. Vocelle, 519 U.S. 837, 117 S.Ct. Ill, 136 L,Ed.2d 63 (1996); Waterfield, v. Crosby, 103 Fed.Appx. 668 (11th Cir.2004); W…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw