NAUTA-LINE DIVISION GLASTRON BOAT CO., APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT L. TERRY, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reasonable Inference cases and more on FLexlaw
Defendant-Nauta Line, appeals from an adverse judgment in a breach of warranty action. We affirm.
Plaintiff purchased a 34 foot houseboat from defendant. After hiring an experienced captain and making several short trips, he embarked on a journey to Free-port, 55 miles distant. After several hours, the boat began taking on water. There was testimony that water was spraying into the boat from a crack in the hull. The boat sank.
This appeal primarily concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict against the manufacturers. We have examined the record and decided the issue contrary to appellant. The jury drew reasonable inferences from the evidence presented.
Affirmed.
WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., and ADAMS, ALTO, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
OLD Colony Ins. Co. v. Bunts, 250 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)…hout power to measure an attorney’s fee except on the basis of quantum meruit or a quid pro quo.’ * * * t> In conformity to the foregoing is the recent decision of this court on this question in Allstate Insurance Company v. Chastain, Fla.App.1971, 250 So. 2d 647. The appellant made the further contention that costs allowed in the judgment were excessive. Upon consideration thereof we find no reason to disturb that feature of the judgment. The record does not disclose any filed objection to the costs or to…