JINKS
v.
RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 2002-10-21
No. 02-258
537 U.S. 972 Supreme Court of the United States (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jinks v. Richland Cnty., 538 U.S. 456 (U.S. 2003)
    …a State’s political subdivisions, because it “interferes with the State’s sovereign authority to establish the extent to which its political subdivisions are subject to suit.” 349 S. C. 298, 304, 563 S. E. 2d 104, 107 (2002). We granted certiorari, 537 U. S. 972 (2002). [*461] K > Respondent and its amici first contend that § 1367(d) is facially invalid because it exceeds the enumerated powers of Congress. We disagree. Although the Constitution does not expressly empower Congress to toll limitations peri…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw