ROSALES ET AL.
v.
KEAN ARGOVITZ RESORTS, INC., ET AL.
ROSALES ET AL.
KEAN ARGOVITZ RESORTS, INC., ET AL.
537 U.S. 975
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Berger, 375 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2004)…mendment right to counsel does not attach. See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F. 3d 336, 339 (5th Cir.2002) (“Several federal courts of appeals have held that there is no constitutional right to counsel for post-appeal motions for new trial.”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975, 123 S.Ct. 443, 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002); Trenkler v. United States, 268 F. 3d 16, 20 (1st Cir.2001) (noting post-conviction, post-appeal Rule 33 motions are collateral and that a criminal defendant has no Sixth Amendment right to an attorney in such…