THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
WILLIAM H. GREEN, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Resignation From The Florida Bar cases and more on FLexlaw
Pursuant to Article 11, Rule 11.08 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A., respondent has filed with this Court a petition for leave to resign from The Florida Bar without leave to apply for read'mission. In its response thereto, the Bar supports the resignation petition, having found after investigation “that the public interest will not be adversely affected by the granting of the petition for leave to resign and that allowing the petitioner to resign will not affect the purity of the Courts, nor hinder the administration of justice, nor the confidence of the public in the legal profession.”
Wherefore, upon consideration of the foregoing, the respondent, William H. Green, hereby is given leave to resign from The Florida Bar effective immediately.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryant v. Uriel Blount, Jr., 261 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)…eview before the three terms had expired was thus himself at fault for the delay. Accordingly, he cannot, with respect to those three terms of court, be heard to complain that his statutory speedy trial protections were not afforded. Meeks v. State, 250 So. 2d 854 (Fla.1971). Following his unsuccessful efforts to be discharged culminating with the Supreme Court’s denial of July 29, 1970, relator filed additional motions for speedy trial under the statute during the September 1970, November 1970, and January…
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Anthony Esperti v. The Honorable J. H. Willson, 250 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1971)…and briefs, we conclude that no jurisdictional conflict is present. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged. It is so ordered. ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JT., concur. . Cf. Meeks v. State, Supreme Court, 250 So. 2d 854, opinion filed June 30, 1971; Carroll v. State, Supreme Court, 251 So. 2d 866, opinion filed July 12, 1971.…
-
Esperti v. State, 276 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)…It [*62] has been held under F.S. § 915.01 that actions by either party which cause automatic stays of trial court proceedings will also toll the running of the speedy trial statute. Carroll v. State, 251 So. 2d 866, 871 (Fla.1971); Meeks v. State, 250 So. 2d 854, 856 (Fla.1971); Bryant v. Blount, 261 So. 2d 847 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1972). In the instant case, prior to the first demand for speedy trial, the State had appealed the granting of a motion to suppress by the appellant. The appeal was taken in January of…