ALL MIAMI APPLIANCES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-08-03
No. 71-213
Before SWANN, C. J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.
251 So. 2d 25 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Panama City v. Hi-Octane Terminal Company, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 197; Oceancoast Corporation v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 802.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …Certiorari denied. 251 So. 2d 25. CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…
  • I. C. Sales, Inc. v. City OF N. Miami, 281 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …he appellant. Thereafter, on August 11, 1972 the court held a full hearing at the conclusion of which the temporary injunction was dissolved and it was decided further that on the basis of All Miami Appliances, Inc. v. City of North Miami, Fla.App., 251 So. 2d 25 (1971), that the defendant-appellee, North Miami, was not bound by the limitations of F.S. § 205.041, F.S.A., and that the license tax is not on its face confiscatory and oppressive. The judge then granted appellee’s motion to dismiss the complaint…
  • Rivera v. Am. Skyhawk Ins. Co., 645 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
    …imed payment. The trial court was correct in finding no coverage for an accident occurring some five months after the cancellation date. See Williams v. Security Mut. Casualty Co., 377 [*541] So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Schemer v. Aetna Ins. Co., 251 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Therefore, the summary judgment under review is affirmed. Affirmed. . Section 627.7282(3), Fla.Stat. (1993) reads: (3) No insurer shall unilaterally alter or modify the policy period for a private passenger automobile i…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw