JINKS

v.

RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 2005)
  …v [*871] erns the arbitration agreement. Bess cannot be distinguished. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals also has addressed the precise claim presented here. In Snowden v. CheckPoint Check Cashing, 290 F. 3d 631, 636 (4th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1087, 123 S.Ct. 695, 154 L.Ed.2d 631 (2002), the court considered whether the plaintiffs contention that a “deferred deposit transaction,” such as the one in this case, was a usurious loan void under Maryland law was subject to arbitration. Noting- that…
• Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (U.S. 2003)