OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
NADINE E. BRUCE AND CLARENCE N. BRUCE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES; OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, V. MARY MCLAY, APPELLEE
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
NADINE E. BRUCE AND CLARENCE N. BRUCE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES; OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, V. MARY MCLAY, APPELLEE
251 So. 2d 141
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Upon examining the record-on-appeal and the arguments presented to us, we hold the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was properly before the jury. Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive System, Inc., Fla.1950, 48 So.2d 82; Holman v. Ford Motor Company, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 40; Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company, 1957, 8 Misc.2d 87, 165 N.Y.S.2d 630 and Domany v. Otis Elevator Company, 6th C.A. 1966, 369 F.2d 604, cert. den. at 387 U.S. 942, 87 S.Ct. 2073, 18 L.Ed.2d 1327.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robbins v. Dep't OF Natural Res., 468 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…h respect thereto. The instant case is more akin to Blythe v. Williams, 356 So. 2d 334, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), another “diving” case, in which the Fourth District reversed summary judgment in favor of the defendant. See also Blankenship v. Davis, 251 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971); compare Switzer v. Dye, 177 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), and Clark v. Lumbermans Mutual Insurance Company, supra. The summary judgment in favor of defendant DNR is reversed, and this cause is [*1045] remanded for further pro…
-
Otto Davis and Virginia Davis v. Blankenship, 257 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1971)…Certiorari denied. 251 So. 2d 141. ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. DEKLE, J., dissents.…
Authorities Cited
- Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive Sys., 48 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1950)
- Holman v. Ford Motor Co., 239 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)
- Domany v. Otis Elevator Co., 369 F.2d 604 (6th Cir. 1966)
- Domany v. Otis Elevator Co., 387 U.S. 942 (U.S. 1967)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Garwin Corp., 387 U.S. 942 (U.S. 1967)