TONEY
v.
TEXAS
TONEY
TEXAS
537 U.S. 1113
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dodd v. United States, 365 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2004)…tute of limitations period for Richardson claims did not begin to run until April 19, 2002, when this Court made Richardson retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review in Ross v. United States, 289 F. 3d 677 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1113, 123 S.Ct. 944, 154 L.Ed.2d 787 (2003). If we adopt this date as the trigger for the statute of limitations, then any motion filed prior to April 19, 2003 — including Dodd’s — would be timely. In the alternative, Dodd says that even if the limitat…
-
United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., 344 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2003)…struction that omits an element of the offense does not necessarily render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair or an unreliable vehicle for determining guilt or innocence.”); Ross v. United States, 289 F. 3d 677, 681 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1113, 123 S.Ct. 944, 154 L.Ed.2d 787 (2003). The appropriate harmless error test in this context is “whether it appears ‘beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.’ ” Neder, 527 U.S. at 15, 119 S.C…