SEITZ
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION
SEITZ
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION
537 U.S. 1124
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. Crosby, 371 F.3d 782 (11th Cir. 2004)…ponte”). We may raise nonjurisdictional issues sua sponte in habeas proceedings only if they implicate “important federal interest[s].” Esslinger, 44 F. 3d at 1524; see, e.g., Moon v. Head, 285 F. 3d 1301, 1315 n. 17 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1124, 123 S.Ct. 863, 154 L.Ed.2d 807 (2003) (“We cannot discern — nor did the district court find — any important federal interest in this case to justify raising the [procedural] bar [issue] sua sponte. We therefore consider the merits.”). For this re…