ALABAMA

v.

MOFFITT

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Jernigan, 341 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …te of Ford v. Garcia, 289 F. 3d 1283, 1294 (11th Cir.2002) (“Where invited error exists, it precludes a court from ‘invoking the plain error rule and reversing.’ ” (quoting United States v. Davis, 443 F. 2d 560, 564-65 (5th Cir.1971))), cert. denied 537 U.S. 1147, 123 S.Ct. 868, 154 L.Ed.2d 849 (2003). In the context of a district court’s decision to admit certain evidence, “ ‘[t]he accepted rule is that where the injection of allegedly inadmissible evidence is attributable to the action of the defense, it…
• United States v. Silvestri, 409 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …d States v. Stone, 139 F. 3d 822, 838 (11th Cir.1998). ‘‘Where invited error exists, it precludes a court from invoking the plain error rule and reversing.” Ford ex rel. Estate of Ford v. Garcia, 289 F. 3d 1283, 1294 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1147, 123 S.Ct. 868, 154 L.Ed.2d 849 (2003) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). See also United States v. Jernigan, 341 F. 3d 1273, 1289-90 (11th Cir.2003) (finding that defendant whose counsel had affirmatively stipulated to the playing of…
• Cabello v. Armando FERNÁNDEZ-Larios, 402 F.3d 1148 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …Cause of Action under the ATCA and TVPA Fernández, citing Ford ex rel. v. Garcia, initially argues that the Cabello survivors cannot bring a TVPA cause of action because he had no command responsibility. 289 F. 3d 1283 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1147, 123 S.Ct. 868, 154 L.Ed.2d 849 (2003). This is not a correct reading of Ford. In Ford, survivors of churchwomen who had been tortured and murdered in El Salvador brought an action under the TVPA, pursuant to the command responsibility doctrine, a…