SELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Alaska Dep't of Env't Conservation v. Env't Prot. Agency, 540 U.S. 461 (U.S. 2004)
  …t ultimately determined, because (1) Comineo failed to “demonstrate] that SCR was economically infeasible,” and (2) “ADEC failed to provide a reasoned justification for its elimination of SCR as a control option.” Id., at 823. We granted certiorari, 537 U. S. 1186 (2003), to resolve an important question of federal . law, i. e., the scope of EPA’s authority under §§ 113(a)(5) and 167, and now affirm the Ninth Circuit's judgment. II ADEC contested EPA’s orders under 42 U. S. C. § 7607 (b)(1), which renders…
• Price v. Vincent, 538 U.S. 634 (U.S. 2003)