WATSON

v.

LITHONIA LIGHTING, DBA HI-TEK GROUP, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• O'Brien v. O'Brien, 899 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 48, 160 L.Ed.2d 17 (2004); United States v. Steiger, 318 F. 3d 1039 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1051, 123 S.Ct. 2120, 155 L.Ed.2d 1095 (2003); Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 302 F. 3d 868 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1193, 123 S.Ct. 1292, 154 L.Ed.2d 1028 (2003). These courts arrived at this conclusion based on the federal law definitions of (1) the term “intercept,” which is very similar to the definition in the Florida Act, (2) the term “wire communication,” whic…
• Mut. Serv. Ins. Co. v. Frit Indus., Inc., 358 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …, Dukes v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 770 F. 2d 545, 549 (5th Cir.1985), we review the district court’s denial of a motion to withdraw admissions for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Miami-Dade County, 297 F. 3d 1255, 1263 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1193, 123 S.Ct. 1291, 154 L.Ed.2d 1028 (2003). The offshore insurers collectively argued in them summary judgment motion that they had no duty to defend Frit in the product liability actions because their policies insured Frit for only one million dolla…