BUSH
v.
TRENT, WARDEN

U.S. | 2003-03-03
No. 02-8411
537 U.S. 1237 Supreme Court of the United States (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Quincy Wade v. Battle, 379 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2004)
    …extraordinary circumstances that are both beyond his control and unavoidable even with diligence.’” Drew v. Dep’t of Corr., 297 F. 3d 1278, 1286 (11th Cir.2002) (quoting Sandvik v. United States, 177 F. 3d 1269, 1271 (11th Cir.1999)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1237, 123 S.Ct. 1364 (2003). “The burden of establishing entitlement to this extraordinary remedy plainly rests with the petitioner.” Id. at 1286. Wade contends that his January 7, 2001 CPC application entitled him to equitable tolling of his AEDPA clo…
  • Dodd v. United States, 365 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2004)
    …ort that determination.” Drew v. Dep’t of Corr., 297 F. 3d 1278, 1283 (11th Cir.2002) (citing Dorsey v. Chapman, 262 F. 3d 1181, 1185 (11th Cir.2001) and quoting Lightning v. Roadway Express, Inc., 60 F. 3d 1551, 1558 (11th Cir.1995)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1237, 123 S.Ct. 1364, 155 L.Ed.2d 205 (2003). “We have squarely held that a determination regarding a party’s diligence is a finding of fact that ‘will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.’ ” Id. (quoting Walters v. City of Atlanta, 803 F. 2d 1135,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw