ANDERSON ET AL.

v.

TREADWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Herring v. Sec'y, Dep't OF Corr., Attorney Gen., State of Fla., 397 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …ifies as an adjudication entitled to deference under § 2254(d). Parker, 331 F. 3d at 775-76; Wright v. Sec’y for the Dep’t of Com., 278 F. 3d 1245, 1253-55 (11th Cir.), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 34 Fed.Appx. 393 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 906, 123 S.Ct. 1511, 155 L.Ed.2d 225 (2003). Moreover, factual findings made by the state courts are presumed to be correct; a petitioner can rebut this presumption by clear and convincing evidence. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1). The state trial court judge…
• Peoples v. Donal Campbell, 377 F.3d 1208 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …court’s denial of Peoples’s Miranda claim constitute an “adjudication” within the meaning of § 2254(d)(1)? If not, the court’s ruling is entitled to no deference. Wright v. Sec’y for the Dep’t of Corr., 278 F. 3d 1245 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 906, 123 S.Ct. 1511, 155 L.Ed.2d 225 (2003), addressed the question we pose: “whether [a] state court’s summary, which is to say unexplicated, rejection of the federal constitutional issue qualifies as an adjudication under § 2254(d) so that it is entit…