WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RELATOR-PETITIONER,
v.
BOARD OF BUSINESS REGULATION ET AL., RESPONDENTS; CALDER RACE COURSE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER, V. RICHARD PALLOT, AS CHAIRMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
West Flagler Associates and Calder Race Course challenged the Florida Board of Business Regulation's grant of 21 additional operating days and 11 matinee performances to Miami Jai Alai as makeup for days lost due to labor-management closure. The Florida Supreme Court partially upheld the Board's action, allowing only 12 makeup operating days and 6 matinee performances based on statutory minimum requirements and equitable considerations.
The Court partially granted the relief sought by relator-petitioners, allowing only 12 makeup operating days and 6 matinee performances (July 2-15, 1971, excluding Sundays). The Board's grant of 21 days and 11 matinees was excessive. The Court upheld at least 12 days based on the statutory minimum of 90 operating days in a twelve-month period and equitable considerations regarding the operator's good-faith expenses.
[1] A statutory proviso limiting the number of operation days for licensed frontons does not preclude granting additional make-up days when a fronton is forced to close due t…
[2] Courts may grant additional make-up operating days beyond statutory minimums for frontons based on equitable considerations and economic factors.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the said commission shall not limit the number of operation days in any twelve-month period for such operators of licensed frontons to less than ninety days or more than one hundred and five days”
Establishes the statutory minimum and maximum operating days requirement that forms the basis for the Court's analysis
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMiami Jai Alai, a licensed fronton operator, was forced to close prior to the end of its licensed season due to labor-management difficulties, resulti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Peremptory Writ cases and more on FLexlaw
By a suggestion for the issuance of a rule nisi in prohibition, a rule absolute and a judgment in prohibition, and an alternative writ of mandamus, a peremptory writ and a judgment of mandamus, the relator-petitioners in these consolidated cases have presented for our review the June 18, 1971, action of the Respondent Board of Business Regulation of the State of Florida. The Board granted 21 additional operating days and 11 matinee performances to Respondent Miami Jai Alai to make up for days lost because it had been forced to close its fronton prior to the end of its licensed season due to labor-management difficulties. Relator-petitioners seek to have this action of the Board declared invalid and illegal. Respondent’s “defenses in response” are treated as a return in prohibition and mandamus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Fla.Const. art. V, § 4(2), F.S.A.
*856Fla.Stat. § 551.12, F.S.A., relating to frontons contains the following express proviso:
“Provided, also, that the said commission shall not limit the number of operation days in any twelve-month period for such operators of licensed frontons to less than ninety days or more than one hundred and five days * *
Because of the minimum 90 days of operation required to be allowed to the fronton operator under this proviso, at least six additional days should be granted under these circumstances beyond the actual 84 days operated this year by Respondent Miami Jai Alai. Upon additional equitable considerations in the light of apparent economic factors involved in setting up for such a short period of time, and in further view of the outlay of expenses already incurred in good faith by said respondent in justified reliance upon the Board’s award of the replacement days for those lost, a total 12 make-up operating days should be affirmed as replacement operation days in these special circumstances and in this one instance only.
Accordingly, the writ of prohibition and the writs of mandamus sought herein are respectively denied to the extent of 12 days and 6 matinees from and including July 2, 1971, through and including July 15, 1971 (excluding the two Sundays not allowed by statute). Judgments in prohibition and mandamus against respondents are hereby entered effective July 16, 1971. The petition for constitutional stay, of course, becomes moot by virtue of this order.
Because of the late hour at which this matter was brought before us and the immediate date of opening the fronton on July 2, 1971, the time for filing any petitions for rehearing are of necessity shortened to 5 days from date of filing of this opinion.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. Division OF Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 253 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1971)…. West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Business Regulation (Fla.) 241 So. 2d 369; West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (Fla.) 251 So. 2d 856, and West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Business Regulation, (Fla.) 251 So. 2d 855.…
-
W. Flagler Assocs., Ltd. v. Bd. OF Bus. Reg. OF the Dep't OF Bus. Reg. of the State of Fla., 265 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1972)…urt of Appeal held that the order of the Board was in keeping with the requirements established by the prior decisions of this Court. The Board in its order referred to our decisions in West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Business Regulation, 251 So. 2d 855 (Fla.1971), and Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc. v. Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 253 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1971), and said that: “[I]n order to afford equality of opportunity to Biscayne and to arm the Board with information necessary to mak…
-
W. Flagler Assocs., Ltd. v. Bd. OF Bus. Reg. OF the Dep't OF Bus. Reg. of the State of Fla., 262 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…d finds that the dates hereinafter awarded meet the criteria set forth by case law and will help assure the state receiving the greatest revenue. In addition, the case of West Flagler [Associates] v. Department [Board] of Business Regulation [Fla.], 251 So. 2d 855 (1971), when read in light of the recent case of Gulf Stream Park Racing Association, Inc. v. Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, et al. [Fla.], 253 So. 2d 429 (1971), indicates that the so called summer dates were to be run by West Flagler and Biscay…