KAFELE

v.

KARNES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Gen. Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 (U.S. 2004)
  …issented in preference for Hamilton and the consensus of the federal courts, thinking it “obvious that the older a person is, the greater his or her needs become.” 296 F. 3d, at 476. We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict among the Circuits, 538 U. S. 976 (2003), and now reverse. II The common ground in this case is the generalization that the ADEA’s prohibition covers “discrimination]. . . because of [an] individual’s age,” 29 U. S. C. § 623(a)(1), that helps the younger by hurting the older. In…
• United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630 (U.S. 2004)
  …cessary not merely to deter intentional wrongdoing, but also to ensure that officers diligently (non-negligently) protect — and properly are trained to protect — the constitutional rights of citizens,” 304 F. 3d, at 1028-1029. We granted certiorari. 538 U. S. 976 (2003). As we explain below, the Miranda rule is a prophylactic employed .to protect against violations of the Self-Incrimination Clause. The Self-Incrimination Clause, however, is not implicated by the admission into evidence of the physical fruit…
• Woodall v. United States, 539 U.S. 975 (U.S. 2003)
  …U. S. 1012; 538 U. S. 1015; 538 U. S. 1036; 538 U. S. 1036; 538 U. S. 1037; 538 U. S. 992; 538 U. S. 1039; 538 U. S. 1030; 538 U. S. 1040; 538 U. S. 1007; 538 U. S. 1008; 538 U. S. 1059; 538 U. S. 1055; ante, p. 905; 538 U. S. 1023; 538 U. S. 1042; 538 U. S. 976; 538 U. S. 1062; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 906; [*977] No. 02-9888. No. 02-9898. No. 02-9910. No. 02-9920. No. 02-9938. No. 02-9953. No. 02-9956. No. 02-10009. No. 02-10020. No. 02-10036. No. 02-10044. No. 02-10047. No. 02-10066. No. 02-10073. No. 02-1…