ABRAHAM MIDGAHL, PETITIONER,

v.

CAPTAIN DEBOIS, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONS DEPARTMENT, AND THE HONORABLE STUART LAMOTTE, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Shevin v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 333 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1976)
  …tion for review was not filed within the time period allowed by the rules, Yamaha International Corp. v. Ehrman, 318 So. 2d 196 (Fla.App.1st 1975); Rule 4.5 c. F.A.R. . Petitioners rely on the decision in Dubin v. Department of Business Regulation, 252 So. 2d 290 (Fla.App.1st 1971) for the proposition that the 30 day time limit for filing should be extended three days when judicial review of administrative orders is sought. Assuming, without deciding, the correctness of the Dubin case, the extra-three-days r…
• Fla. Admin. Comm'n v. Dist. Court OF Appeal, 351 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1977)
  …CA 1976). . Section 120.52(2), Fla.Stat. (1975). . Section 120.68(2), Fla.Stat. (1975). . Yamaha Int’l Corp. v. Ehrman, 318 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). .Section 120.54(13), Fla.Stat. (1975). . Cf. Dubin v. Department of Business Regulation, 252 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). . Section 120.54 was amended by the 1976 Legislature. A new Section 120.545 was added in 1976, which describes in detail the procedure . for and the effect of objections by the legislative committee. These changes are not appli…
• Franchi v. Fla. Dep't of Commerce, 375 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
  …3.-07(4)(c) for assistance. That section implies that orders of the Board of Review become effective and the time for initiating review commences when notice of the order is given to the party affected. In Dubin v. Department of Business Regulation, 252 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971) the First District examined similar language in the former Section 120.26(7) of the Administrative Procedures Act. The end result was that the prompt notification requirements of the above statutory provisions were construed by b…

Authorities Cited

• Berend v. Louie L. Wainwright, 155 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1963)