JONES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2005)
  …rendi regime seriously inaccurate”); United States v. Brown, 305 F. 3d 304, 309 (5th Cir.2002) (stating that Apprendi “did not change what the Government must prove, only that the jury, rather than the judge must decide” the question), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1007, 123 S.Ct. 1919, 155 L.Ed.2d 840 (2003). Although Apprendi reflects due process concerns, it does not address a miscarriage of justice or effect a judicial upheaval to the degree necessary to require its retroactive application. See Coleman v. Uni…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Windom v. State, 886 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2004)
  …540 U.S. 1061, 124 S.Ct. 840, 157 L.Ed.2d 719 (2003); United States v. Swinton, 333 F. 3d 481, 491 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 977, 124 S.Ct. 458, 157 L.Ed.2d 330 (2003); United States v. Brown, 305 F. 3d 304, 309 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1007, 123 S.Ct. 1919, 155 L.Ed.2d 840 (2003); Goode v. United States, 305 F. 3d 378, 382-85 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1096, 123 S.Ct. 711, 154 L.Ed.2d 647 (2002); United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F. 3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 5…
• Woodall v. United States, 539 U.S. 975 (U.S. 2003)
  …37 U. S. 1195; 537 U. S. 1074; 538 U. S. 980; 538 U. S. 932; ante, p. 916; 538 U. S. 1003; 538 U. S. 1004; 538 U. S. 1012; 538 U. S. 1015; 538 U. S. 1036; 538 U. S. 1036; 538 U. S. 1037; 538 U. S. 992; 538 U. S. 1039; 538 U. S. 1030; 538 U. S. 1040; 538 U. S. 1007; 538 U. S. 1008; 538 U. S. 1059; 538 U. S. 1055; ante, p. 905; 538 U. S. 1023; 538 U. S. 1042; 538 U. S. 976; 538 U. S. 1062; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 906; [*977] No. 02-9888. No. 02-9898. No. 02-9910. No. 02-9920. No. 02-9938. No. 02-9953. No. 02-995…