BROWN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 2009)
  …an order denying Brown’s counsel’s request to withdraw. Neither Brown nor her counsel “ever raised the issue before the district court for review of the magistrate judge’s order.” 299 F. 3d 1252, 1259 (11th Cir.2002), judgment vacated and remanded, 538 U.S. 1010, 123 S.Ct. 1928, 155 L.Ed.2d 847 (2003), opinion reinstated on remand, 342 F. 3d at 1246. Accordingly, Brown’s appeal amounted to an appeal directly from the magistrate judge’s ruling, and we lacked jurisdiction. Id.; see also United States v. Meie…
• United States v. Steed, 548 F.3d 961 (11th Cir. 2008)
  …on was based on his experience and expertise, in conjunction with the information he received from a DEA intelligence agent and Bermudan authorities, and that such sources of information were regularly relied upon in valuating narcotics.”); vacated, 538 U.S. 1010, 123 S.Ct. 1928, 155 L.Ed.2d 847 (2003), remanded to and reinstated by, 342 F. 3d 1245 (11th Cir.2003). In sum, even assuming that the bases of Gonzalez’s expertise as a law enforcement agent constituted inadmissible hearsay, his testimony in this…
• United States v. Garcia, 447 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2006)
  …stifying as an expert witness • may rely on information he received from other people if “such sources of information were regularly relied upon” “by experts in his field.” United States v. Brown, 299 F. 3d 1252, 1257, 1258 (11th Cir.2002), vacated, 538 U.S. 1010, 123 S.Ct. 1928, 155 L.Ed.2d 847 (2003), remanded to and reinstated by 342 F. 3d 1245 (11th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 823, 125 S.Ct. 37, 160 L.Ed.2d 34 (2004). We have stated, for example, that “Rule 703 encompasses hearsay statements in a…