MELVIN L. FRANKLIN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Robinson v. State, 438 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …t based on the evidence presented in court. United States v. Jiminez-Diaz, 659 F. 2d 562 (5th Cir.1981). See also Irvin v. Doud, 366 U.S. 717, 723, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1643, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1960); Singer v. State, 109 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1959); Murphy v. State, 252 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). . Factors to be considered in determining the possibility of prejudice are how closely related the publicity is to the case, its timing, its prominence, its tone and the likelihood the jury was exposed to it. United States v. He…
• Lavado v. State, 469 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …dio broadcast, the nature of the prejudice was never brought to the attention of the trial court and we find no abuse of discretion under the circumstances in refusing to poll the jury. Copeland v. State, 457 So. 2d 1012 (Fla.1984); Murphy v. State, 252 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) affirmed Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794, 95 S.Ct. 2031, 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975). Therefore for the reasons above stated the conviction under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.…
• Moore v. State, 299 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …ad read the article about the defendant’s arrest and all six of the jurors stated they were not biased. Absent a showing of bias it is presumed that the jurors will base their verdict upon the evidence given at trial. Murphy v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So. 2d 385. Further, an impartial jury is not required to be totally ignorant of the facts and issues involved and may have formed some impression or opinion as to the merits of the case, particularly in criminal matters without being subject to objection on p…

Authorities Cited

• Leone v. State, 233 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)
• Daniels v. State, 233 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)