CORNELL STATEN, PETITIONER,

v.

LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• State of Fla. ex rel. William Scaldeferri v. Sandstrom, 285 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 1973)
  …$50,000.00.' It is so ordered. CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., concur. . Ma.Const. art. Y, §§ 3, 4 and 5, F.S.A. . Fla.Stat. § 79.10, F.S.A.; State v. Kelly, 88 So. 2d 118 (Fla.1956) (res judicata) ; cf. Jones v. Wainwright, 252 So. 2d 570 (Fla.1971) ; Johns v. Wainwright, 253 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1971). .Fla.Const. Art. I, § 12. . Judge Carroll’s special concurrence in Renaldi points out the alternatives of issuing the writ returnable before the circuit court for hearing or relinquishin…
• Johns v. Louie L. Wainwright, 253 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1971)
  …ause it was untimely filed. Now, petitioner invokes habeas corpus proceeding alleging the same errors as those presented to the District Court of Appeal and decided adversely to him. This Court will not reconsider those issues. Jones v. Wainwright, 252 So. 2d 570, opinion filed September 8, 1971. [*874] This is in essence a petition for conflict certiorari (labeled habeas corpus) to circumvent the requirement of the rule that the petition be filed within thirty days from the decision of the District Court.…
• Lamberti v. Louie L. Wainwright, 284 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1973)
  …asked to consider those identical issues which were previously raised and disposed of adversely to the petitioner by the District Court of Appeal, Third District. That Court refused to entertain such thoughts. As was stated in Jones v. Wainwright, 252 So. 2d 570 (Fla.1971): “This Court will not reconsider on a petition for writ of habeas corpus those issues already considered and determined by another appellate court. ... As between the state and this defendant, those issues already disposed of are res jud…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Earton David Jones v. Louie L. Wainwright, 252 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1971)