PHILLIPS, ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF PHILLIPS, DECEASED

v.

MONROE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Wight v. Wight, 880 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …dissolution proceeding. However, the fact that this is an hourly fee case, as opposed to a contingency fee case, should not make a difference. McMahan v. Toto, 311 F. 3d 1077, 1085 (11th Cir.2002) cert. denied sub nom. Nemesis Veritas, L.P. v. Toto, 539 U.S. 914, 123 S.Ct. 2273, 156 L.Ed.2d 129 (2003). In McMahan, the party who sought fees for litigating the amount of fees argued that because his was an hourly fee case and Palma was a contingency fee case, Palma’s reasoning should not apply. Id. at 1086. Th…
• Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. S. Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (U.S. 2004)
  …affects the purchase of vehicles, as the Fleet Rules do, that regulation is not a standard.” 158 F. Supp. 2d 1107, 1118 (CD Cal. 2001). The Ninth Circuit affirmed on the reasoning of the District Court. 309 F. 3d 550 (2002). We granted certiorari. 539 U. S. 914 (2003). II Section 209(a) of the CAA states: “No State or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines subject to this p…
• Johnston v. Tampa Sports Auth. & Henry G. Saavedra, 530 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2008)
  …law as interpreted by the Florida Supreme Court, and, absent a contrary ruling by the Florida Supreme Court, Florida’s intermediate appellate courts. McMahan v. Toto, 311 F. 3d 1077, 1080 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, Nemesis Veritas, L.P. v. Toto, 539 U.S. 914, 123 S.Ct. 2273, 156 L.Ed.2d 129 (2003); Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665, 666 (Fla.1992) (“the decisions of the district courts of appeal represent the law of Florida unless and until they are overruled by this Court.”) (internal quotation marks omit…