CHARLES ROBERTSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-10-06
No. 70-495
Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.
252 So. 2d 593 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on March 9, 1971 (245 So.2d 304) affirming the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 16, 1971 (250 So.2d 1) and mandate now lodged in this court, the judgment of this court was quashed and the cause remanded with directions;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the judgment of this court filed in this cause on March 9, 1971 is vacated as it applies to appellant Robertson, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the cause is remanded to the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, with instructions that the criminal prosecution upon the charge of conspiracy against Charles Homer Robertson, appealed from in this cause, be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • M. David Sims, M.D. v. Brown, 574 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1991)
    …n what anybody has testified to as far as I know.” Even if wrongfully excluded, the exclusion of cumulative testimony is not an adequate basis for vacating a jury verdict. Carlton v. King, 51 Fla. 158, 40 So. 191 (1906); Farmer v. B.F. Goodrich Co., 252 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 255 So. 2d 686 (Fla.1971). Our review of the record discloses that good and valid grounds existed for the trial judge to reject the evidence discussed above. At the very least no abuse of the trial judge’s discretion wa…
  • Detroit Marine Eng'g, Inc. v. Maloy, 419 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
    …te. Error, if any, in the admission of this document is harmless, for the same information was already before the jury without objection in the form of testimony by Paul Weitzman, a former engineer at Sheller-Globe. See Farmer v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 252 So. 2d 593, (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), cert. denied 255 So. 2d 686 (Fla.1971). Similarly, we find no reversible error in the admission of a Sheller-Globe memorandum dated April 30,1981, which stated that during tests performed on the white insertless wheel, two wheel…
  • Farmer v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 255 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 1971)
    …Certiorari denied. 252 So. 2d 593. CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw