H. WALTER FULLER AND WALTER P. FULLER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
MRS. M. A. BROWN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
H. WALTER FULLER AND WALTER P. FULLER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
MRS. M. A. BROWN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
101 Fla. 517
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 134 So. 234
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been *518seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alford v. The Barnett Nat'l Bank of Jacksonville, 137 Fla. 564 (Fla. 1939)…Quitman Naval Stores Co. v. Conway, 63 Fla. 253, 58 So. 840; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Citizens’ & People’s Bank, 74 Fla. 385, 77 So. 104, L. R. A. 1918C 610;West Yellow Pine Co. v. Stephens, 80 Fla. 298, 86 So. 241; Fletcher v. Dees, 101 Fla. 402, 134 So. 234; Shaw v. Little Rock & Ft. Smith R. Co., 100 U. S. 605, 25 L. Ed. 757; Easton v. Hodges, 18 Fed. 677; Duggan v. Wright, 157 Mass. 228, 32 N. E. 159; Bank of Rochester v. Jones, 4 N. Y., (4 Coms.) 497; 55 Am. Dec. 290; Blackman v. Lehman, 63 Ala. 547…
-
Seiff v. Presto Brick Mach. Corp., 168 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…ard. 'Vy’e affirm. There was no right of possession in the plaintiffs at the time of the distraint sale. With no right of possession, there could have been no conversion. See: Dekle v. Calhoun, 60 Fla. 53, 53 So. 14; Fletcher v. Dees, 101 Fla. 402, 134 So. 234; Allen v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corporation, Fla.App.1961, 133 So. 2d 442. It is also doubtful whether the plaintiffs were entitled to an equitable lien on the chattel subsequent to the distraint sale, but this point was not preserved for review…
-
Ethna Hudson, 150 Fla. 523 (Fla. 1942)…gently done or omitted, is sufficient. See American District Electric Protective Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. 129 Fla. 518, 177 So. 294; Kneeland v. Tampa Northern R. Co., 94 Fla. 702, 116 So. 48; McLeod Construction Co. v. Cooper, 101 Fla. 441, 134 So. 234; Duval v. Hunt, 34 Fla. 85, 15 So. 876; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Beazley, 54 Fla. 311, 45 So. 761; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Good, 79 Fla. 589, 84 So. 733; Woodcock [*535] v. Wilcox 98 Fla. 14, 122 So. 789; Triay v. Seals, 92 Fla. 310, 109 S…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence