STATE EX REL. FIVE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ET AL.,
v.
J. M. LEE, AS STATE COMPTROLLER
STATE EX REL. FIVE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ET AL.,
J. M. LEE, AS STATE COMPTROLLER
139 Fla. 835
Florida Supreme Court (1939)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 191 So. 10
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This case is before us for consideration pursuant to oral argument after rehearing was granted pursuant to our opinion and judgment filed and entered January 5, 1938 (181 So. 179), to allow relators to join issue on affirmative allegations of answer and to take testimony before a commissioner appointed for that purpose.
Plaving considered the record as it now appears, we find the allegations of the answer sufficient and supported by the evidence taken. So the alternative writ is quashed on authority-of our former opinion, supra.
So ordered.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Buford and Thomas, J. J. concur.
Justice Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peterson v. Hancock, 146 Fla. 410 (Fla. 1941)…112 Sou. 48; Cobb v. Cobb, 82 Fla. 287, 89 Sou. 869; Davidson v. Collier, 75 Fla. 783, 78 Sou. 983; Simpson v. First Nat. Bank, 74 Fla. 539, 77 Sou. 204; Kirkpatrick [*413] v. Hindman, 95 Fla. 880, 882, 116 Sou. 862; Hawley v. Kendall, 139 Fla. 850, 191 Sou. 10; Markell v. Hilpert, 140 Fla. 842, 192 Sou. 392; Knabb v. Mabry, 137 Fla. 530, 188 Sou. 586; Rariden v. Jason, 138 Fla. 145, 189 Sou. 410; Tippins v. Belle Mead Develop. Corp., 136 Fla. 373, 188 Sou. 787; Reaves v. Sadler, 136 Fla. 553, 189 Sou. 41;…
-
Jay Dillon and his wife v. J. W. Walter, Inc., 98 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)…h in Section 687.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A, In support of their position they cite Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199, 169 So. 750; Stoutamire v. North Florida Loan Ass’n, 152 Fla. 321, 11 So. 2d 570; Hawley v. Kendall, 139 Fla. 850, 191 So. 10; Burket v. Johnson, Fla., 61 So. 2d 197; and Beach v. Kirk, 138 Fla. 80, 189 So. 263. In all of the cited cases there was actually either a loan of money to a borrower from the party found to be usurer, or the usurer had advanced money to a third p…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Lee, 132 Fla. 183 (Fla. 1938)