IN RE DANIELS; IN RE TAYLOR; IN RE ANTOINE; AND IN RE HAYES

Citator

Cited By

• Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (U.S. 2004)
  …2), relying on the Washington Supreme Court’s rejection of a similar challenge in Gore, supra, at 311-315, 21 P. 3d, at 275-277. The Washington Supreme Court denied discretionary review. 148 Wash. 2d 1010, 62 P. 3d 889 (2003). We granted certiorari. 540 U. S. 965 (2003). II This case requires us to apply the rule we expressed in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U. S. 466, 490 (2000): “Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maxim…
• Hiibel v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Court of Nev., 542 U.S. 177 (U.S. 2004)
  …d the Fourth Amendment challenge in a divided opinion. 118 Nev. 868, 59 P. 3d 1201 (2002). Hiibel petitioned for rehearing, seeking explicit resolution of his Fifth Amendment challenge. The petition was denied without opinion. We granted certiorari. 540 U. S. 965 (2003). II NRS § 171.123(3) is an enactment sometimes referred to as a “stop and identify” statute. See Ala. Code §15-5-30 (West 2003); Ark. Code Ann. § 5-71-213(a)(1) (2004); Colo. Rev. Stat. §16-3-103(1) (2003); Del. Code Ann., Tit. 11, §§ 1902(…
• United States v. Raphael R. Levy, 391 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …al issue is whether the claim was waived or only forfeited. See Olano, 507 U.S. at 732-34, 113 S.Ct. at 1777. . Levy's first brief was filed on May 21, 2002. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Blakely on October 20, 2003. Blakely v. Washington, 540 U.S. 965, 124 S.Ct. 429, 157 L.Ed.2d 309 (2003). . I realize that we regularly refer to issues not timely briefed as being "waived.” See, e.g., United States v. Veltmann, 6 F. 3d 1483, 1493 (11th Cir.1993). In a typical criminal appeal — i.e., when a defenda…