BON AIRE MOTEL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD C. DOWDY, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1971-10-15
No. 70-954
PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
253 So. 2d 265 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record-on-appeal and find that the issues of negligence and contributory negligence were properly submitted to the jury.

The other points on appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lesperance v. Lesperance, 257 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
    …d 140; Rinker Materials Corporation v. Holloway Materials Corporation, Fla.App.1965, 175 So. 2d 564; Fairfax Broadcasting Co. v. Florida Airmotive, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 252 So. 2d 854; State ex rel. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Nathan, Fla.App.1971, 253 So. 2d 265, (opinion filed October 12, 1971) ; Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. Clark, 7th Cir. 1961, 288 F. 2d 1; Bros. Incorporated v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Company, 5th Cir. 1963, 320 F. 2d 594; Kinnear Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, 5…
  • Mrs. Fenton Davis Avant v. Waites, 295 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
    …tion of the order is hereby quashed.” (175 So. 2d at page 566) We completely agree with the above quoted holding based upon the facts in that case. We have also examined the Second District case of Bonair Motel, Inc. v. Dowdy, Fla.App. (2nd) 1971, 253 So. 2d 265, but are unable to determine from the facts there reported whether the court in that case passed directly upon the issue now before us. In Fairfax Broadcasting Co. v. Florida Airmotive, Inc., Fla.App. (4th) 1971, 252 So. 2d 854, our sister court of…
  • Abdo v. Khalil Abdo (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)
    …from the terms of an appellate mandate." (quoting Mendelson v. Mendelson, 341 So. 2d 811, 813-14 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977))). For that reason, prohibition is appropriate. See § 35.08, Fla. Stat. (2020); State ex rel. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Nathan, 253 So. 2d 265, 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); King v. L & L Investors, Inc., 136 So. 2d 671, 672-74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); cf. State ex rel. Paluska v. White, 162 So. 2d 697, 699 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964) (noting that prohibition would lie in a "situation where a lower court, fo…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw