COCHRAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF EDMOND, OKLAHOMA
v.
BARNTHOUSE ET AL.
COCHRAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF EDMOND, OKLAHOMA
BARNTHOUSE ET AL.
540 U.S. 981
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2005)…2003); Head v. Hill, 277 Ga. 255, 587 S.E. 2d 613, 619 (2003); Porter v. State, 140 Idaho 780, 102 P. 3d 1099 (2004); State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 245, 664 N.W. 2d 892, 908 (2003); Colwell v. State, 118 Nev. 807, 59 P. 3d 463, 471 (2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 981, 124 S.Ct. 462, 157 L.Ed.2d 370 (2003); Moeller v. Weber, 689 N.W. 2d 1 (S.D.2004); Ex parte Briseno, 135 S.W. 3d 1, 9-10 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) ("[W]e join those courts that have held that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ring ... is not retroactively…
-
Windom v. State, 886 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2004)…v. Hill, 277 Ga. 255, 587 S.E. 2d 613, 619 (2003); State v. Lotter, 266 [*941] Neb. 245, 664 N.W. 2d 892, 908 (2003), petition for cert. filed, No. 03-7361 (U.S. Nov. 7, 2003); Colwell v. State, 118 Nev. 807, 59 P. 3d 463, 471 (2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 981, 124 S.Ct. 462, 157 L.Ed.2d 370 (2003). The Ninth Circuit, and one state supreme court, have held that it does. See Summerlin v. Stewart, 341 F. 3d 1082, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. granted, 540 U.S. 1045, 124 S.Ct. 833, 157 L.Ed.2d 692 (2003);…
-
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200 (U.S. 2004)…, and interdependent remedial scheme,” Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Russell, 473 U. S. 134, 146 (1985), found at § 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 891, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1132(a) et seq. 540 U. S. 981 (2003). We hold that the causes of action are completely pre-empted and hence removable from state to federal court. The Court of Appeals, having reached a contrary conclusion, is reversed. I A Respondent Juan Davila is a participant, and respon…