ARELLANO-LUJANO
v.
UNITED STATES; GUZMAN-LUNA V. UNITED STATES; MELENDEZ V. UNITED STATES; AND ROSALES, AKA ROMAN-RAMIREZ, AKA QUIROZ V. UNITED STATES
ARELLANO-LUJANO
UNITED STATES; GUZMAN-LUNA V. UNITED STATES; MELENDEZ V. UNITED STATES; AND ROSALES, AKA ROMAN-RAMIREZ, AKA QUIROZ V. UNITED STATES
540 U.S. 998
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. United States, 572 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2009)…e entire record reveal[ed] no arguable issues of merit....” United States v. Thomas, 65 Fed.Appx. 712 (2003) (per curiam) (“Thomas /”). The Supreme Court subsequently denied Thomas’s petition for a writ of certiorari. See Thomas v. United States, 540 U.S. 998, 124 S.Ct. 504, 157 L.Ed.2d 401 (2003). Thomas then proceeded pro se and filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, in which he raised twelve grounds for relief, including, inter alia, that (1) the di…