PARKER ET AL.
v.
OHIO ET AL.
PARKER ET AL.
OHIO ET AL.
540 U.S. 1013
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. Glades Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs, 493 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2007)…razor-thin that it does not meet the ‘safe district’ standards of courts that have approved race-conscious realignments in other electoral contexts.”). Pointing to Parker v. Ohio, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (S.D.Oh.2003) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 540 U.S. 1013, 124 S.Ct. 574, 157 L.Ed.2d 426 (2003), furthermore, does not help the majority’s case. In Parker, the court merely reaffirmed what our own circuit has stated in the past — that influence districts are not cognizable remedies under the Voting Rights…1 / 2