PENDARVIS CHEVROLET, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

THE SPECIAL DISABILITY FUND (LESLIE M. STEELE), AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• William I. Sabates, M.D. v. Int'l Med. Ctrs., Inc., 450 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …without its exceptions. Thus, where legislation clearly mandates that the dispute be resolved in a judicial forum, the policy fa [*517] voring arbitration will yield. See Shearson, Hammill & Co. v. Vouis, 247 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 253 So. 2d 444 (Fla.1971) (where agreement to arbitrate inconsistent with provision of Florida Securities Law preserving the right to bring an action in court, securities law will control); Young v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 434 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). See a…
• Raymond v. Vallery V. Maves and Ethel Pryor Maves, 384 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …e, 334 So. 2d 287 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). In that case, citing Mills v. Robert W. Gottfried, Inc., 272 So. 2d 837 (Fla.4th DCA 1973), this court refused to apply the rational of Shearson, Hammill & Co. v. Vouis, 247 So. 2d 733 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 253 So. 2d 444 (Fla.1971). The Shearson court had refused to compel arbitration because of the policy of Florida securities law, citing Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed. 168 (1953). However, the Wilko case offers no support for such a policy argu…
• Young v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 434 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …. 3d DCA 1982) which has incorporated that viewpoint at least at this point.1 In so holding, the trial court overlooked the controlling decision of this district in Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc. v. Vouis, 247 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 253 So. 2d 444 (Fla.1971), which is directly contrary to Melamed. Although the Vouis opinion has been the subject of some criticism in other districts, today we reaffirm the conclusion, if not the rationale, of that decision. Vouis holds broadly that (1) arbitrati…