ARTHUR COLEMAN SEWELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARTHUR COLEMAN SEWELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
253 So. 2d 458
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1971)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Laboda v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 107; Saunders v. State, Fla.App.1970, 238 So.2d 680; and Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723.
REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Morey, 339 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)…d should not be granted merely to relieve the petitioner who seeks the writ from the expense and inconvenience of a trial, Wright v. Sterling Drugs, 287 So. 2d 376 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); Smith v. State, 187 So. 2d 61 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); Earnest v. State, 253 So. 2d 458 (Fla.1st DCA 1971).1 Morey and King’s Gate did not demonstrate that the county court had exceeded its jurisdiction or departed from the essential requirements of the law or that, if convicted, that appeal would not afford each defendant a proper rem…
-
Segura v. State, 272 So. 3d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Rodeheaver v. State, 224 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Saunders v. State, 238 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
- Atl. Corp. v. Biscayne Fin. Co., 239 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
- Laboda v. State, 239 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)