SAVASTA & CO., INC.
v.
GEROSA ET AL.
SAVASTA & CO., INC.
GEROSA ET AL.
540 U.S. 1074
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bergen v. Comm'r OF Soc. Sec., 454 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2006)…DISCUSSION I. To resolve this appeal, we are called upon to engage in an exercise of statutory interpretation. We review the district court’s interpretation of a statute de novo. Stroup v. Barnhart, 327 F. 3d 1258, 1260 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1074, 124 S.Ct. 935, 157 L.Ed.2d 745 (2003). “[I]f the statute speaks clearly to the precise question at issue, we must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.” Barnhart v. Walton, 535 U.S. 212, 217-18, 122 S.Ct. 1265, 1269, 152 L…
-
Bergen v. Comm'r OF Soc. Sec., 444 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2006)…DISCUSSION I. To resolve this appeal, we are called upon to engage in an exercise of statutory interpretation. We review the district court’s interpretation of a statute de novo. Stroup v. Barnhart, 327 F. 3d 1258, 1260 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1074, 124 S.Ct. 935, 157 L.Ed.2d 745 (2003). “[I]f the statute speaks clearly to the precise question at issue, we must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.” Barnhart v. Walton, 535 U.S. 212, 217-18, 122 S.Ct. 1265, 1269, 152 L…