LEZAJIC

v.

ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Fernandez v. State, 917 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …asked to produce his driver’s license,” relying on Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1891, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979), Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983), and State v. Diaz, 850 So. 2d 435 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1075, 124 S.Ct. 936, 157 L.Ed.2d 745 (2003). Following denial of the motion to suppress, appellant pleaded no contest, reserving his right to appeal that ruling. This appeal follows. As appellant correctly argued in the trial court, the outcome of thi…
• Merlan Davis v. State, 953 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …g, Mr. Davis appealed that denial. We affirmed on December 11, 2002. See Davis v. State, 840 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (table). Finally, on December 8, 2003, the Supreme Court denied Mr. Davis’ petition for writ of certiorari. See Davis v. Fla., 540 U.S. 1075,124 S.Ct. 921,157 L.Ed.2d 747 (2003). Mr. Davis then filed a rule 3.850 motion in December 2005; that motion underlies this appeal.2 He asserted four claims, none of which were raised in his January 4, 2001, motion. First, Mr. Davis contends that h…
• State v. Tullis, 970 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …the statute as proposed by the defendant would not give effect to the plain meaning of the words “clearly visible.” Holly v. Auld, 450 So. 2d 217, 219 (Fla.1984). We also find Tullis’ reliance on State v. Diaz, 850 So. 2d 435 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1075, 124 S.Ct. 936, 157 L.Ed.2d 745 (2003), to be misplaced. In Diaz, the officer stopped the defendant because the expiration date on the defendant’s temporary tag was not legible from the officer’s motor vehicle. As the officer approached the defendan…