BATES ET AL.
v.
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
BATES ET AL.
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
540 U.S. 1088
Supreme Court of the United States (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for the Dist. of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367 (U.S. 2004)…Allowing discovery to determine the applicability of the defacto membership doctrine, he concluded, is inappropriate. He would [*378] have issued the writ of mandamus directing dismissal of the complaints. 334 F. 3d, at 1119. We granted certiorari. 540 U. S. 1088 (2003). We now vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the ease for further proceedings to reconsider the Government’s mandamus petition. II As a preliminary matter, we address respondents’ argument that the Government’s petition fó…
-
Dep't of Transp. v. Public Citizen, 541 U.S. 752 (U.S. 2004)…he agency’s CAA determination reflected the “illusory distinction between the effects of the regulations themselves and the effects of the presidential rescission of the moratorium on Mexican truck entry.” 316 F. 3d, at 1030. We granted certiorari, 540 U. S. 1088 (2003), and now reverse. II An agency’s decision not to prepare an EIS can be set aside only upon a showing that it was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 5 U. S. C. § 706(2)(A). See also Mars…
-
Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for the Dist. of Columbia, 541 U.S. 913 (U.S. 2004)…C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 540 U. S. 1088.] Motion to recuse, referred to Justice Scalia [540 U. S. 1217], and by him denied. Memorandum of Justice Scalia. I have before me a motion to recuse in these cases consolidated below. The motion is filed on behalf of respondent Sierra Club. [*91…