MITCHELL, WARDEN
v.
ESPARZA; NEESE V. JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MARION COUNTY, OREGON; PHILLIPS V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GAINES V. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; TAYLOR V. WILLIAMS ET AL.; PETERSON V. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AYALA V. UNITED STATES; HARRISON V. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT ET AL. IN RE FERENC, BENNETT V. OREGON; JONES V. BOEING CO.; BANKS V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; PATEL ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; RANEY V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; MCGEE V. TEXAS; HELLER V. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD; RESPER V. UNITED STATES; PEGG V. HAVILAND, WARDEN; THORNTON V. HOLDEN, GOVERNOR OF MISSOURI; ROBINSON V. HOOKS ET AL.; SILVA V. UNITED STATES; SPINDLE V. BROWNLEE, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL.; SUVANNUNT V. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; SWAINSON V. LAVAN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT DALLAS; CARDWELL V. HANKS, SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; OMUNA V. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.; BAKER V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; WARREN V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; SALLIE V. THIEL; WEBB V. HARRIS, SHERIFF, PAULDING COUNTY, GEORGIA; TAYLOR V. BOOT ET AL.; WHITEHEAD V. BUSH, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL.; GREEN V. BROWNWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; CHINN V. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, ET AL.; COCHELL V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; RAWLS V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; BEAHRINGER V. BRILEY, WARDEN, ET AL., HELMS V. CONROY, WARDEN, ET AL.; GIRARD V. HENDRICKSON, WARDEN, ET AL.; EYRICH V. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; WOLFE V. VIRGINIA; WATSON V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; HOWZE V. BUTLER, WARDEN; BANUELOS V. HALL, WARDEN, ET AL.; WILSON V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; LURIA V. LURIA ET AL.; PORTER V. KEARNEY HOUSE ET AL.; AMRHEIN-MACON V. MACON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MACON, DECEASED; THOMAS V. CITY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO, ET AL.; GRIFFIN V. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.; KNECHT V. WEBER, WARDEN, ET AL.; BROMWELL V. DORMIRE, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSOURI STATE PENITENTIARY; WINSETT V. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; WALTERS V. TUGLE ET AL.; SURVILLA V. HOLIDAY INN ET AL.; TRAN V. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PROVINCETOWN ET AL.; PEARLMAN V. VIGIL-GIRON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW MEXICO; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; PINEYRO V. CAIN, WARDEN, IN RE CULLUM, WILLIAMS V. OHIO; WILLIAMS V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IN RE TAYLOR, GARCIA V. SCIBANA, WARDEN; COINER V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; ZAKARIA V. UNITED STATES, IN RE BEACHUM, REID V. UNITED STATES, IN RE BRUNO

U.S. | 2004-01-12
Nos. 02-1369; No. 02-10556; No. 02-10694; No. 02-10829; No. 02-11000; No. 02-11013; No. 02-11068; No. 02-11116; No. 02-11159; No. 02-11174; No. 02-11282; No. 02-11338; No. 03-190; No. 03-316; No. 03-363; No. 03-384; No. 03-5135; No. 03-5212; No. 03-5277; No. 03-5306; No. 03-5310; No. 03-5375; No. 03-5455; No. 03-5481; No. 03-5489; No. 03-5496; No. 03-5500; No. 03-5507; No. 03-5625; No. 03-5713; No. 03-5717; No. 03-5728; No. 03-5734; No. 03-5773; No. 03-5777; No. 03-5789; No. 03-5798; No. 03-5843; No. 03-5868; No. 03-5877; No. 03-5929; No. 03-5945; No. 03-5985; No. 03-5997; No. 03-6008; No. 03-6039; No. 03-6118; No. 03-6173; No. 03-6186; No. 03-6188; No. 03-6206; No. 03-6264; No. 03-6328; No. 03-6331; No. 03-6340; No. 03-6377; No. 03-6385; No. 03-6388; No. 03-6408; No. 03-6436; No. 03-6448; No. 03-6519; No. 03-6526; No. 03-6563; No. 03-6606; No. 03-6713; No. 03-6835; No. 03-6851; No. 03-6927; No. 03-7155
540 U.S. 1142 Supreme Court of the United States (2004)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This document is a Supreme Court orders list denying petitions for rehearing in numerous cases decided during the 2003 term, reflecting the Court's decisions to maintain its prior rulings across a diverse array of legal matters including criminal justice, administrative law, and civil disputes. The orders consolidated multiple denial decisions, with each case number corresponding to previously decided opinions referenced in the volume. No new legal principles were established in this orders list, which served as a procedural disposition of post-decision requests for reconsideration.


Headnotes

[1] A petition for rehearing is a procedural mechanism to request reconsideration of a court's decision.

[2] Denial of a petition for rehearing signifies that the court has declined to reconsider its prior ruling.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 12; No. 02-10556. No. 02-10694. No. 02-10829. No. 02-11000. No. 02-11013. No. 02-11068. No. 02-11116. No. 02-11159. No. 02-11174. No. 02-11282. No. 02-11338. No. 03-190. No. 03-316. No. 03-363. No. 03-384. No. 03-5135. No. 03-5212. No. 03-5277. No. 03-5306. No. 03-5310. No. 03-5375. No. 03-5455. No. 03-5481. No. 03-5489. No. 03-5496. ante, p. 831; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 949; ante, p. 1004; ante, p. 968; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 895; ante, p. 899; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 901; ante, p. 905; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 912; No. 03-5500. No. 03-5507. No. 03-5625. No. 03-5713. No. 03-5717. No. 03-5728. No. 03-5734. No. 03-5773. No. 03-5777. No. 03-5789. No. 03-5798. No. 03-5843. No. 03-5868. No. 03-5877. No. 03-5929. No. 03-5945. No. 03-5985. No. 03-5997. No. 03-6008. No. 03-6039. No. 03-6118. No. 03-6173. ante, p. 912; ante, p. 913; ante, p. 920; ante, p. 952; ante, p. 953; ante, p. 953; ' ante, p. 953; ante, p. 926; ante, p. 954; ante, p. 954; ante, p. 926; ante, p. 956; ante, p. 929;' ante, p. 957; ante, p. 1019; ante, p. 1019; ante, p. 970; ante, p. 970; ante, p. 970; ante, p. 986; ante, p. 988; ante, p. 989; No. 03-6186. No. 03-6188. No. 03-6206. No. 03-6264. No. 03-6328. No. 03-6331. No. 03-6340. No. 03-6377. No. 03-6385. No. 03-6388. No. 03-6408. No. 03-6436. No. 03-6448. No. 03-6519. No. 03-6526. No. 03-6563. No. 03-6606. No. 03-6713. No. 03-6835. No. 03-6851. No. 03-6927. No. 03-7155. ante, p. 989; . ante, p. 989; ante, p. 990; ante, p. 1007; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 991; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 1021; ante, p. 1008; ante, p. 1021; ante, p. 976; ante, p. 1008; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 965; ante, p. 997; ante, p. 1010; ante, p. 1024; ante, p. 980; ante, p. 1026; and ante, p. 1045. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw