JACKSON ET AL.

v.

PERRY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371 (U.S. 2005)
  …No. 5:02cv19 MMP (July 11, 2002), pp. 2, 4, App. in [*377] No. 03-7434, pp. 45, 48. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed, agreeing with the dissent in Xi. 337 F. 3d 1289 (2003). We granted certiorari in both cases. Benitez v. Mata, 540 U. S. 1147 (2004); Crawford v. Martinez, 540 U. S. 1217 (2004). II Title 8 U. S. C. § 1231(a)(6) provides, in relevant part, as follows: “An alien ordered removed who is inadmissible under section 1182 of this title, removable under section 1227(a)(1)(C), 1…
• Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The ESTÉE Lauder Cos., Inc., 797 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …applies. Notably, Otter Tail involved “a vertically integrated monopolist that refuse[d] to deal with a customer to foreclose competition in a second market.” See Covad Commc’ns Co. v. BellSouth Corp., 299 F. 3d 1272, 1289 (11th Cir.2002), vacated, 540 U.S. 1147, 124 S.Ct. 1143, 157 L.Ed.2d 1040 (2004), overruled on other grounds by Covad II, 374 F. 3d 1044; see also IIIB Phillip E. Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶ 772b3, at 205 (3d ed. 2008) (“The defendant [in Otter Tail ] possessed a natural m…
• Andrx Pharms., Inc. v. Elan Corp., PLC, 421 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …ations of antitrust violations); Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp., 299 F. 3d 1272, 1279 (11th Cir.2002) (describing the threshold requirements for properly pleading an antitrust violation as “exceedingly low”), vacated on other grounds by 540 U.S. 1147, 124 S.Ct. 1143, 157 L.Ed.2d 1040 (2004). Accordingly, absent some doctrine which immunizes the conduct alleged, such as the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, “dismissals [on the pleadings] are particularly disfavored in fact-intensive antitrust cases.” C…