WILLIAM STEVEN DAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM STEVEN DAY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
253 So. 2d 722
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Day v. State, 233 So.2d 194 (Fla.App.1970).
CARROLL, DONALD, Acting C. J., RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Abner Wynn Gordon v. The John Deere Co., 264 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1972)…manner as a nonresident. This section shall not apply to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act. Added by Laws 1970, c. 70-90, § 1, eff. July 1, 1970.” . Gordon v. John Deere Co., 320 F.Supp. 293, 295 (N.D.Fla.1970). . 253 So. 2d 722 (Fla.App.3rd 1971). . Id. 253 So. 2d at 723. . Annot.: Retrospective Application of State Statutes Conferring In Personam Jurisdiction over Nonresidents, 19 A.L.R. 3rd 138 (1968).…
-
Am. Motors Corp. & Jeep Corp. v. Abrahantes, 474 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…2d 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, 308 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Barton v. Keyes Co., 305 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Marshall v. Johnson, 301 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Robert E. Marx, Inc. v. Scarney, 253 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). The result we reach is supported by two well-established rules of construction: first, “[a] statute is not to be given a retrospective effect unless its terms show clearly that such an effect was intended,” In re Seven Barrels of…
-
Barton v. The Keyes Co., 305 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…ective July 1, 1973. The sections of the statute may not be applied retroactively to causes of action which accrued prior to their effective date. Gordon v. John Deere Company, Fla.1972, 264 So. 2d 419; Robert E. Marx, Inc. v. Scarney, Fla.App.1971, 253 So. 2d 722; Marshall v. Johnson, Fla.App.1974, 301 So. 2d 134. It is apparent that upon the record as it stood at the time of the trial judge’s order (see footnote 1, supra), the statute was given retroactive application. The order appealed must be reversed u…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- DAY v. State, 233 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)