LEOCAL
v.
ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

U.S. | 2004-02-23
No. 03-583
540 U.S. 1176 Supreme Court of the United States (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2004)
    …nd was removed to Haiti in November 2002. In June 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed petitioner’s petition for review, relying on its previous ruling in Le, supra. App. to [*6] Pet. for Cert. 5a-7a. We granted certiorari, 540 U. S. 1176 (2004), to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals on the question whether state DUI offenses similar to the one in Florida, which either do not have a mens rea component or require only a showing of negligence in the operation of a vehicle,…
  • …1, 2002), p. 10, App. to Pet. for Cert. 51a, but a divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed, holding that § 1231(b)(2) does not require acceptance by the destination country, 329 F. 3d, at 633-635. We granted certiorari. 540 U. S. 1176 (2004). II Title 8 U. S. C. § 1231(b)(2), which sets out the procedure by which the Attorney General1 selected petitioner’s destination after removal was ordered, was enacted as follows: “(2) Other aliens. — Subject to paragraph (3)— “(A) Select…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw