MORE

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD; COOK V. GALAZA, WARDEN; JAQUEZ V. OKLAHOMA; IBRAHIM V. IBRAHIM ET AL.; MASSEY V. BANK OF EDMONSON COUNTY AND DIRECTORS ET AL.; MARTONE V. NEISWANGER ET AL.; ABE V. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; GOSSARD V. JONES; PANNELL V. DAVIS, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON; SINISTERRA V. UNITED STATES; SMITH V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WATTS V. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (TWO JUDGMENTS); WARICK V. PARKER, WARDEN; MILLER V. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.; FORSETH V. FARMON, WARDEN, ET AL.; MESTER V. LEWIS, WARDEN, ET AL., IN RE JOHNSON, METZENBAUM V. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OHIO, ET AL.; MCWILLIAMS V. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BALLARD V. PRICE, WARDEN; PATTERSON V. JENKINS, CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, ET AL.; LARA V. PENNSYLVANIA; WATSON V. JOB CORP. ET AL.; REYNOLDS V. SMITH, WARDEN; MCCOY V. COTTON, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; LIVINGSTON V. ZIMMER; ALEXANDER V. UNITED STATES; DARNELL V. JOHNSON, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; HENDRICKS V. VAUGHN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD; JONES V. SOUTHWEST FIDUCIARY, INC., ET AL.; MORRIS V. UNITED STATES; HUNT V. MALONEY, COMMISSIONER, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ET AL.; LOOPER V. TENNESSEE; BELLE V. FLORIDA BAR; KUHN V. MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, ET AL.; LIGON ET UX. V. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO.; PINEDA V. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, IN RE BEASLEY, IN RE PARIS, O'CONNOR V. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; O'CONNOR V. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; HUFF V. VIRGINIA; LAMAR V. GRAVES, WARDEN; ROMERO-LEWIS V. UNITED STATES; HADDEN V. UNITED STATES; SHIVAEE V. CUBE; BURNES V. UNITED STATES; O'CONNOR V. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; TARANTOLA V. UNITED STATES; BROWN V. UNITED STATES; METCALF V. UNITED STATES; BONDURANT V. UNITED STATES; WHITEHEAD V. SWYGERT ET AL.; JEFFERSON V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PRINCE V. UNITED STATES; LOGAN V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2004-02-23

Nos. 02-9971; No. 02-10457; No. 02-10526; No. 02-11176; No. 03-81; No. 03-550; No. 03-610; No. 03-5012; No. 03-5197; No. 03-5286; No. 03-5308; No. 03-5729; No. 03-5755; No. 03-5799; No. 03-6132; No. 03-6234; No. 03-6354; No. 03-6499; No. 03-6500; No. 03-6508; No. 03-6550; No. 03-6566; No. 03-6625; No. 03-6645; No. 03-6678; No. 03-6729; No. 03-6733; No. 03-6740; No. 03-6745; No. 03-6785; No. 03-6787; No. 03-6828; No. 03-6846; No. 03-6857; No. 03-6858; No. 03-6859; No. 03-6864; No. 03-6913; No. 03-6919; No. 03-6934; No. 03-6935; No. 03-6959; No. 03-6991; No. 03-7007; No. 03-7040; No. 03-7090; No. 03-7120; No. 03-7187; No. 03-7190; No. 03-7278; No. 03-7280; No. 03-7303; No. 03-7340; No. 03-7398; No. 03-7429; No. 03-7433

540 U.S. 1214 Supreme Court of the United States (2004)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This was a Supreme Court order addressing petitions for rehearing in a consolidated list of forty-three cases spanning diverse legal matters including employment law, corrections, social security, and administrative review. The Court denied all petitions for rehearing across the various cases cited in the order.

Opinion of the Court

538 U. S. 1063; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 830; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 1089; ante, p. 1075; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 1073; ante, p. 901; ante, p. 1006; ante, p. 954; ante, p. 955; ante, p. 988; ante, p. 973; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1054; ante, p. 1055; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 1057; ante, p. 1057; ante, p. 1059; ante, p. 1010; ante, p. 1023; No. 03-6745. No. 03-6785. No. 03-6787. No. 03-6828. No. 03-6846. No. 03-6857. No. 03-6858. No. 03-6859. No. 03-6864. No. 03-6913. No. 03-6919. No. 03-6934. No. 03-6935. No. 03-6959. No. 03-6991. No. 03-7007. No. 03-7040. No. 03-7090. No. 03-7120. No. 03-7187. No. 03-7190. No. 03-7278. No. 03-7280. No. 03-7303. No. 03-7340. No. 03-7398. No. 03-7429. No. 03-7433. ante, p. 1076; ante, p. 1078; ante, p. 1023; ante, p. 1060; ante, p. 1060; ante, p. 1079; ante, p. 1091; ante, p. 1091; ante, p. 1079; ante, p. 1002; ante, p. 1016; ante, p. 1061; ante, p. 1061; ante, p. 1061; ante, p. 1080; ante, p. 1062; ante, p. 1063; ante, p. 1064; ante, p. 1076; ante, p. 1061; ante, p. 1066; ante, p. 1068; ante, p. 1085; ante, p. 1083; ante, p. 1124; ante, p. 1125; ante, p. 1094; and ante, p. 1094. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Nitschke v. Oregon, 538 U.S. 1063 (U.S. 2003)
Clemons v. Louisiana, 538 U.S. 1063 (U.S. 2003)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw