NABELEK
v.
TEXAS

U.S. | 2004-03-22
No. 03-8381
541 U.S. 930 Supreme Court of the United States (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Corona v. State, 64 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 2011)
    …cision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). The Supreme Court granted Corona’s petition and remanded the case to the Fifth District for further consideration in light of Crawford. See Corona v. Florida, 541 U.S. 930, 124 S.Ct. 1658, 158 L.Ed.2d 352 (2004). On remand, the Fifth District agreed with Corona’s arguments that Crawford was applicable to his case. Yet the court noted that it had to determine whether his claim was preserved for review in accordance wi…
  • Corona v. State, 929 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …ted States Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court decided Crawford v. Washington in March 2004. Corona’s petition was thereafter granted and the case was remanded to this court for reconsideration in light of Crawford. See Corona v. Florida, 541 U.S. 930, 124 S.Ct. 1658, 158 L.Ed.2d 352 (2004). In Crawford the Supreme Court held that a testimonial hearsay statement is inadmissible at trial unless the declarant is shown to be unavailable and the party against whom the statement is admitted had an op…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw