EDLUND
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
EDLUND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
541 U.S. 973
Supreme Court of the United States (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. Landstar Sys., Inc., 541 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2008)…orgement. See Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass’n v. New Prime, Inc., 213 F.R.D. 537, 545 (W.D.Mo.2002) (“Although disgorgement is an equitable remedy, it does not qualify as injunctive relief.”), aff'd 339 F. 3d 1001 (8th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 973, 124 S.Ct. 1878, 158 L.Ed.2d 467 (2004). The Owner-Operators cite to the Savings Clause, 49 U.S.C. § 13103, for the proposition that the district court can impose broad equitable remedies for violations of the Truth-in-Leasing regulations. We disa…
-
Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. Landstar Sys., Inc., 622 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2010)…orgement. See Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass’n v. New Prime, Inc., 213 F.R.D. 537, 545 (W.D.Mo.2002) (“Although disgorgement is an equitable remedy, it does not qualify as injunctive relief.”), aff'd 339 F. 3d 1001 (8th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 973, 124 S.Ct. 1878, 158 L.Ed.2d 467 (2004). The Owner-Operators cite to the Savings Clause, 49 U.S.C. § 13103, for the proposition that the district court can impose broad equitable remedies for violations of the Truth-in-Leasing regulations. We disa…