MELVIN B. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1971-11-12
No. 71-229
PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
254 So. 2d 219 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict Jones as a principal in the first degree for robbery, as he aided and abetted the crime.


Facts & Procedural History

Jones was present during a robbery where he made statements to the attendant, Gillenwater, who was removing cigarettes. Jones's actions and words were…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MANN, Judge.

MANN, Judge.

Jones said that he and Hudson, the eighteen-year-old in charge of the Jet service station on that fateful Sunday morning, were just jiving around. Hudson agreed that that was how it started, but that Jones grabbed Hudson’s head, squeezed, and said to Gillenwater, by then in the act of removing a carton of cigarettes from the premises, “I’m going to hold his head.” Whether Jones was just jiving around or aiding and abetting in robbery was a jury question which was decided against Jones.

The cases1 on which Jones relies as demonstrating the insufficiency of evidence against him are easily distinguishable. Douglas worked at the same place as Sands, the active criminal, and was riding with him when Sands drove to the victim’s house, went in alone and assaulted and robbed her. Although Douglas was perhaps an accessory after the fact, nothing linked him to the robbery at the time of its occurrence. The evidence against Williams was entirely circumstantial — not the case here — and the State was required to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Gilday was not shown to have any notion of complicity in his companion’s intent to rob. In this case Jones rather encouraged Gillenwater to rob Hudson, and consequently our statute2 which makes the aider and abetter liable as a principal in the first degree makes Melvin Jones a full-fledged robber.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martin v. State, 262 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
    …r ruling here. . Fla.1916, 72 Fla. 228, 72 So. 677. . State v. Wright, Fla.1969, 224 So. 2d 300; State v. Contreras, Fla.1969, 227 So. 2d 306; State v. Owens, Fla.1970, 233 So. 2d 389; Farrior v. State, Fla.1954, 76 So. 2d 148. . Fla.App.2d 1971, 254 So. 2d 219. . Fla.App.3d 1968, 214 So. 2d 653. . Williams v. State, Fla.App.4th 1968, 206 So. 2d 446; Gilday v. State, Fla.App.3d 1964, 168 So. 2d 205.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw